![]() ![]() Wayang does not allow reduction below starting RAW.ĭeveloper saying it would be strange for someone to say the Magical Lineage FAQ wouldn't also apply to Wayang Spellhunter. Even if you can't abuse them quite as heavily as you may have first thought, any caster who has a signature spell that craves metamagic would be higly advised to consider one or both traits. Perhaps my above assertion isn't so easy to work with after all :/Įither way, Both Magical Lineage and Wayang Spellhunter are fantastic traits. I mean, really, just look at how many FAQs have been issued, with a staggering amount left to go (and more every day). Even if the rule is "Everything is exactly by the book, no exceptions!" There are still questionable calls and semi(or very)ambiguous rules to interpret, thus two different groups with similar composition (party structure, using the same AP, players make similar decisions, etc.) running "by the book" rulesets can have drastic differences. Was it JJ or SKR that had the famous "Duck Analogy" for situations similar to this? The premise that things that do EXACTLY THE SAME THING should work EXACTLY THE SAME is a pretty easy one to work with, right?Īlso, off topic: Anytime a person mentions a PFS ruling, someone is bound to say "oh, that's just house rules" or something to that effect really irritates me. I agree that RAI you are right but not RAW. RAW nothing stops wayang spellhunter from reducing spell level below original.įor instance you could get a 0 level merciful magic missile using wayang spellhunter. PFS clarifacations are just houserules for organized play. You can make the case that the faq disallows any combination involving magical linrage from dropping the spell level lower than original sure.īut wayang can by itself. RAI sure it probably should but it doesnt. Notice how it says nothing about wayang spellhunter. ![]() For example, it won't allow you to alter a wizard's fireball into 2nd-level spell. Magical Lineage (trait): Can I use this trait to adjust a spell's effective level below the unmodified spell's original level? ![]() Wayang spellhunter is able to reduce the metamagic cost to below the original spell level. Mahical lineage only drops the spell level to its original level. Magical lineage is bound by the magical lineage faq. If this is for PFS, there's already been a campaign clarification issued that Wayang Spellhunter can't reduce a spell's level below the original level. You can ask your GM, and they might disagree. But there's no reason to think it doesn't work the same way. It isn't mentioned, because it's in a book that doesn't get FAQs issued. No, Wayang Spellhunter is bound by the same FAQ. Better effect and you can apply your 0 cost metamagics as well. Take a +1 metamagic say toppling smack it on magic missile and apply magical lineage and then wayang spellhunter. And you can stack them to drop it even further. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |